Residential and in-home care needs to be virtually fully
paid for by the federal government, Conservative MP Jacob Rees-Mogg has mentioned.
He argued that social care contributions needs to be capped
at £5,000 a yr to make sure pensioners don't lose their properties and their
life financial savings to pay for care prices.
Writing for The Telegraph, Rees-Mogg argued that it
is best to pool threat by paying for social care out of common taxation,
slightly than imposing “ruinous” prices on individuals when they're at their most
weak.
That is at odds with Matt Hancock, the Well being Secretary,
who is known to favour a system of social care insurance coverage primarily based on the
auto-enrolment pension scheme. A cap of £100,000 on private contributions is
additionally into account.
A report by the Coverage Alternate think-tank, supported by
Rees-Mogg, means that social care needs to be funded by means of common taxation,
with solely the wealthiest pensioners anticipated to contribute additional, at a most
charge of £5,000 per yr.
Rees-Mogg argued that it's inherently unfair that whereas
the state pays for the healthcare wants of individuals with all different sicknesses,
reminiscent of most cancers, these with dementia or different wants related to previous age are
anticipated to pay out of their very own pocket “till they're right down to their final
£23,250”.
Social care prices a median of £44,000 per yr,
based on Coverage Alternate.
As an alternative, he mentioned social care needs to be free on the level
of use, just like the NHS.
Post a Comment