Residential and in-home care ought to be nearly solely
paid for by the federal government, Conservative MP Jacob Rees-Mogg has mentioned.
He argued that social care contributions ought to be capped
at £5,000 a 12 months to make sure pensioners don't lose their houses and their
life financial savings to pay for care prices.
Writing for The Telegraph, Rees-Mogg argued that it
is best to pool threat by paying for social care out of normal taxation,
somewhat than imposing “ruinous” prices on individuals when they're at their most
susceptible.
That is at odds with Matt Hancock, the Well being Secretary,
who is known to favour a system of social care insurance coverage primarily based on the
auto-enrolment pension scheme. A cap of £100,000 on private contributions is
additionally into consideration.
A report by the Coverage Alternate think-tank, supported by
Rees-Mogg, means that social care ought to be funded by normal taxation,
with solely the wealthiest pensioners anticipated to contribute additional, at a most
charge of £5,000 per 12 months.
Rees-Mogg argued that it's inherently unfair that whereas
the state pays for the healthcare wants of individuals with all different diseases,
equivalent to most cancers, these with dementia or different wants related to previous age are
anticipated to pay out of their very own pocket “till they're all the way down to their final
£23,250”.
Social care prices a mean of £44,000 per 12 months,
in keeping with Coverage Alternate.
As an alternative, he mentioned social care ought to be free on the level
of use, just like the NHS.
Post a Comment